Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 882 days older than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i5-2400S - $58.23 vs $70.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-2400S - $0.23 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 55 vs 65 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
250
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$58.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $58.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |