Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1989 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 10% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $70.0 vs $78.02
- Up to 2% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.45 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-2400S - 170 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 12 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
97%
Price, $
$78.02
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |