Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2045 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $78.02 vs $94.98
- Up to 13% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i3-12100F - $0.49 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Halo Infinite than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 170 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 58 vs 140 Watts
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
158
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
87%
Price, $
$94.98
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |