Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 749 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 15% better in HITMAN 2 than Pentium G3258 - 135 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 37% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $49.37 vs $78.02
- Up to 28% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.42 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
72%
Price, $
$78.02
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3283 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
117
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |