Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1386 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3220 - 133 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $78.02 vs $79.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3220 - $0.59 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3369 minutes ago
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3368 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |