Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - $79.0 vs $84.99
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-3220 - 418 vs 374 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i3-3220 - $0.2 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
418
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$84.99
92%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |