Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 62% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $37.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 63% better value when playing Fortnite than Celeron G3930 - $0.17 vs $0.46 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Fortnite than Celeron G1610 - 215 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10068 minutes ago
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10071 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |