Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690K is 546 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-4690K - $37.0 vs $53.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-4690K - $0.26 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 55 vs 88 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Celeron G1610 - 150 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10826 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-4690K Processor 3.9 4 BX80646I54690K
Buy for $53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10827 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-4690K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 88 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
