Key Differences
In short — Pentium G2120 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G2120 is 91 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 29% cheaper than Pentium G2120 - $37.0 vs $52.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Pentium G2120 - $0.38 vs $0.53 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2120
- Performs up to 1% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G1610 - 99 vs 98 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11577 minutes ago
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11577 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium G2120 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |