Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $312
Availability
MSRP in USD: $312
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4770 is 181 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-4770 - $37.0 vs $74.95
- Up to 46% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i7-4770 - $0.47 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i7-4770 - 55 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Performs up to 10% better in Remnant II than Celeron G1610 - 86 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14148 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-4770 Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.4 GHZ LGA 1150 8 MB Cache BX80646I74770
Buy for $74.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-4770
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
