Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 893 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-5675C - $37.0 vs $90.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-5675C - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610 - 130 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
31.791044776119403%
Multi-Core
739
18.117185584702135%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |