Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $37.0 vs $111.99
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 38% better in New World than Celeron G1610 - 135 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74652 minutes ago
Buy for $111.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74653 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
19.443176631675037%
Multi-Core
739
8.29405162738496%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |