Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 2044 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 8% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-6900K - 314 vs 291 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $120.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-12400F - $0.41 vs $2.87 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 16 vs 12 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
314
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.87/FPS
14%
Price, $
$899.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18017 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
291
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18018 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |