Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10600K - 146 vs 136 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $143.7 vs $899.99
- Up to 83% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-12400F - $1.06 vs $6.16 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.16/FPS
17%
Price, $
$899.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6186 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |