Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1222 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 159 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $899.99 vs $1075.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $5.66 vs $7.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$899.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5796 minutes ago
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5797 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |