Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $37.0 vs $161.76
- Up to 55% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i5-12400 - $0.56 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 97% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron G1610 - 130 vs 66 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5775 minutes ago
Buy for $161.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5776 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |