Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 294 days older than the cheaper Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $161.76 vs $165.91
- Up to 2% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-11600KF - $0.93 vs $0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i5-12400 - 175 vs 174 FPS
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
174
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$161.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $161.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
97%
Price, $
$165.91
97%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |