Key Differences
In short — Core i7-870 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-870 is 1182 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-870 - $37.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-870 - $0.12 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-870 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-870 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Performs up to 0% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G1610 - 297 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14393 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14393 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-870 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |