Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2699 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $37.0 vs $94.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen 3 3100 - $0.23 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 8% better in God of War than Celeron G1610 - 175 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14585 minutes ago
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14585 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |