Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $37.0 vs $93.74
- Up to 55% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i3-10100 - $0.18 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 16% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G1610 - 236 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13905 minutes ago
Buy for $93.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13906 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |