Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $92.52 vs $115.99
- Up to 9% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-11400F - $0.51 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-10100 - 208 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$92.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $92.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
91%
Price, $
$115.99
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |