Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-870 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10100 is 3887 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-870.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-870 - 132 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-870 - $93.9 vs $100.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-870 - $0.71 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-870 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-870 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |