Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1947 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 46% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $37.0 vs $68.02
- Up to 43% better value when playing Lost Ark than Celeron G4900 - $0.17 vs $0.3 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G1610 - 229 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
