Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $37.0 vs $52.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-7400T - $0.17 vs $0.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Celeron G1610 - 221 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13355 minutes ago
Intel BX80677I57400T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7400T Processor
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13357 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
