Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2774 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than Core i3-560 - 161 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-560 - $53.55 vs $60.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-560 - $0.33 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 54 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.55
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
154
95.65217391304348%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
56.896551724137936%
Price, $
$60
89%
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |