Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4146 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-560 - 135 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i3-560 - $59.99 vs $60.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-560 - $0.44 vs $0.52 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1702 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1702 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-560 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarkdale | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
73 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |