Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7350K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7350K is 455 days older than the more expensive Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 54 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 15% better in Minecraft than Celeron G4900 - 714 vs 619 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $51.6 vs $68.02
- Up to 36% better value when playing Minecraft than Celeron G4900 - $0.07 vs $0.11 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
714
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |