Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 455 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 43% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $39.0 vs $68.02
- Up to 41% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G4900 - $0.16 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4051 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
251
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4051 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |