Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $312
Availability
MSRP in USD: $312
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4770 is 1311 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-4770 - $39.0 vs $74.95
- Up to 47% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-4770 - $0.33 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-4770 - 35 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G3930T - 121 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-4770 Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.4 GHZ LGA 1150 8 MB Cache BX80646I74770
Buy for $74.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-4770
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-4770 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
