Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 455 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 43% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $39.0 vs $68.02
- Up to 42% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G4900 - $0.33 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930T - 120 vs 119 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |