Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 551 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $39.0 vs $74.38
- Up to 46% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-6400 - $0.22 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Celeron G3930T - 182 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Buy for $74.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |