Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 915 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $39.0 vs $82.07
- Up to 44% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 3 3200G - $0.09 vs $0.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 13% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G3930T - 515 vs 455 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-Core Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for $82.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
