Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2135 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 4% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-4930K - 201 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i7-4930K - $81.39 vs $89.95
- Up to 15% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-4930K - $0.4 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |