Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2135 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - $89.95 vs $98.15
- Up to 3% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 5 3400G - $0.35 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Core i7-4930K - 270 vs 258 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
258
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3096 minutes ago
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3097 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |