Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1948 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-2120T - 116 vs 114 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i3-2120T - $39.0 vs $60.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-2120T - $0.34 vs $0.53 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
116
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16069 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16069 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i3-2120T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |