Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2403 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 12% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $60.0 vs $68.02
- Up to 9% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Celeron G4900 - $0.39 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-2120T - 159 vs 153 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3295 minutes ago
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |