Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2365 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 4% better in Grand Theft Auto V than FX-8120 - 110 vs 106 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 41% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $39.99 vs $68.02
- Up to 39% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron G4900 - $0.38 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |