Buy on Amazon
$68.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2641 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Core i5-2400 - 93 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 49% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $34.95 vs $68.02
- Up to 48% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Celeron G4900 - $0.38 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-2400 Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
