Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2400 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2400 is 694 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1610 - 150 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $34.95 vs $37.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1610 - $0.23 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 55 vs 95 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |