Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1696 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 12% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $34.95 vs $39.9
- Up to 17% better value when playing Valorant than Celeron G3900 - $0.05 vs $0.06 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 0% better in Valorant than Core i5-2400 - 694 vs 692 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
692
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2174 minutes ago
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |