Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1420 days newer than the more expensive FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than FX-8120 - 256 vs 251 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than FX-8120 - $39.9 vs $39.99
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2563 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2563 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |