Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1352 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Pentium G3250 - 160 vs 159 FPS
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 10% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $61.0 vs $68.02
- Up to 12% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Celeron G4900 - $0.38 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 53 vs 54 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1369 minutes ago
Buy for $61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1369 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |