Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 357 days older than the more expensive Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 22% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G4900 - 128 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $42.88 vs $68.02
- Up to 48% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Celeron G4900 - $0.34 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1208 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $42.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |