Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3220T is 91 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i3-3220T - $37.0 vs $59.4
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Performs up to 1% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1610 - 140 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-3220T Dual-Core Processor 2.8 Ghz 3MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637i33220T
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
93.01310043668121%
Multi-Core
739
78.53347502656747%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220T |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
