Buy on Amazon
$80
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $194
Availability
MSRP in USD: $194
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-3570 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-3570 is 94 days older than the more expensive Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3220T - 129 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i3-3220T - $69.0 vs $80.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3220T - $0.53 vs $0.63 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-3220T Dual-Core Processor 2.8 Ghz 3MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637i33220T
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5886 minutes ago
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
129
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3570 Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53570
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5885 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
