Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3410 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3220T - 170 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i3-3220T - $49.99 vs $59.4
- Up to 26% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3220T - $0.29 vs $0.39 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
154
90.58823529411765%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
74.35897435897435%
Price, $
$59.4
84%
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
28.57142857142857%
Multi-Core
941
34.903560830860535%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |