Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3220T outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3220T is 120 days older than the more expensive Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $59.4 vs $70.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i3-3210 - $0.35 vs $0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |