Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3210 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3210 is 856 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-560 - 225 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 55 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $60.0 vs $70.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i3-3210 - $0.27 vs $0.31 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15282 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |