Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3290 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 34% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3210 - 190 vs 142 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $59.99 vs $70.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i3-3210 - $0.32 vs $0.49 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core i3-3210 3.20GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33210
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
