Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1463 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $70.0 vs $75.0
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 28% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-3210 - 311 vs 243 FPS
- Up to 17% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-3210 - $0.24 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
243
78.13504823151125%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
82.75862068965517%
Price, $
$70
100%
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
311
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
93%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
50.04916420845624%
Multi-Core
1018
36.279401282965075%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |